'Seeing is believing' goes the adage, but I don't think it's true.
Anyone who says 'I'd believe if only I saw...' isn't to be believed; they understand neither themselves nor the nature of their beliefs.
At first seeing may well lead to believing but only until believing becomes unpopular (socially or personally) and then suddenly (as if by magic) our sight is called in for questioning; excuses are made and belief will slip out the back door of doubt claiming 'I lost faith.'
The question is, do we lose it or just stop it?
Belief is less linked to sight than people realise and is instead linked more to our actions and our affiliations. On the one hand we believe what we repeatedly do and we do whatever we intuitively want to do; and what we want, is the result of our conditioning and our culture. On the other hand we believe what the communities we're part of make attractive for us to believe. We believe whatever our society has made plausible for us to believe.
It's those two realities that underpin what I think is the greatest threat to the church for a generation.
The longer our churches are closed the longer our behaviour conforms to the patterns of our culture, and since our society has worked hard (and deliberately) to make secularism and atheism seem the more plausible, a prolonged swim in these waters without the rhythm, routine and re-education of Sunday mornings will make following Jesus appear less true, attractive and necessary.
That is to say nothing of what is actually true, but only what becomes true for us by the way we behave.
Another factor in this has been the effective diluting of our churches into social clubs and the appealing of our churches to consumer trends that has gone on over the past two decades. In the name of mission we have worked hard to serve people sound-bitey sermons and emotionally charged worship and even written daily devotionals for them to read - 'don't read the Bible yourself, just read what I got out of it when I read it.' we effectively say to them. We've done these things to such an extent that fewer Christians have substantial daily practises of their own to help draw them closer to God. The church has become so reliant on the professionals (the Free Church equivalent of the clergy) that we have created a lazy form of Christianity - and since we haven't spoken more attractively and intentionally about the beauty of Christian truth in the face of deliberate campaigns to undermine traditional Christian ethics, we have created an apologetic and limp-wristed church perhaps more dependent on Sundays to 'keep 'em coming back' than ever before.
When our church doors do open again I'm not saying that there'll be no one there to worship, but only wondering aloud what the long term effect this lockdown will have had on those who are there.
What we've done in the past three months has instilled beliefs (by way of our behaviour) that will now hold more plausibility (and therefore truth) than will Jesus' words and the historic rhythms of the church. We've clapped for the NHS, reinforcing the importance of public righteousness and centrality of our culture's cult of Health. We've talked incessantly about the strength of the economy, reinforcing the value of the office above the household, and those of us with children have talked often about how we 'can't wait to get the kids back to school' perhaps settling for good our desire to delegate away from parents the educating of our children - teach them whatever you want, just don't ask me to do your job!
Of course it hasn't all been doom and gloom; or has it?
Educating our churches to 'watch church from home' might be better than nothing, but only just. While it 'wins' in maintaining a routine that in turn helps play into Christianity's plausibility, it 'loses' by playing into consumerism and encouraging a 'take it or leave it' spirituality that is devoid of sacrifice, commitment and relationship. Some will contest that there's been plenty of positive pastoral and community oriented response - serving our neighbours, supporting those in need, delivering food etc. Whilst that has certainly been true, my concern is that too often this has been done by a committed core minority and not the majority, it's the same few faces on every Zoom call with whole households conspicuously absent from our lives. When churches do eventually come back together inevitably there'll be greater feelings of imposter syndrome among those who went underground and didn't engage in the community life. Retreating into our private households may have kept some us more physically healthy than the alternative but it has undone five year's hard work on the part of our churches to break the isolationist individualism that makes genuine church fellowship so hard. The default mode of our age is to embrace me over we, so without weekly routines that force me back into we we're allowed to indulge more in what is a much easier and more natural fit for us.
It seems to me that these things make up the real crisis affecting the church. Things have certainly changed, but not necessarily for the better. All we've done in the last few months will have changed for good what we believe, or maybe it will have just shown what was already there.